
Filed under: ehealth, Psychology, technology
February 18, 2012 • 10:11 am 0

Filed under: ehealth, Psychology, technology
January 17, 2012 • 7:51 am 0
Adding, Not the Same as Including: Making Family Research Relevant for All by Gonzalo Bacigalupe (2012) in The Family Psychologist, 28(1), 12-14
As a researcher that holds a strong allegiance to a non-dominant group, I have had the opportunity to become a member of the privileged. However, I am often reminded that I am truly not a part of the ruling class. Despite being a highly educated tenured faculty member, I can still be a subaltern—the other. Every now and then, a university adjunct professor will automatically assume that I am one of the cleaning staff and will address me as such if I speak Spanish with the Dominican janitor who picks up the trash every evening at my office. In the struggle with marginalization, as one of the few professors in my college who can claim a similar heritage to the janitor (although he cannot claim some of my privileges), I am often compelled to name reality, to deconstruct it, and to be attentive to what is silencing the vulnerable. Being a subaltern, therefore, makes me particularly aware of institutionalized “isms” and being able to see what is generally invisible to the privileged is nothing less than a privilege too. It teaches me to pay attention to how stereotypes define people and how institutionalized racism continues to play a role in educational and healthcare institutions.
Filed under: Community, Family, Psychology, Research, Transnational
December 21, 2011 • 11:56 am 3
Los 80: Fiction, Reality, Memory and Trauma in Chile.
Gonzalo Bacigalupe published in Spanish at Movimiento Generacion 80 Blog
Memory is fragile and the space of a single life is brief, passing so quickly that we never get a chance to see the relationship between events; we cannot gauge the consequences of our acts, and we believe in the fiction of past, present, and future, but it may also be true that everything happens simultaneously. … That’s why my Grandmother Clara wrote in her notebooks, in order to see things in their true dimension and to defy her own poor memory. (Isabel Allende in the House of the Spirits)
The fourth season of the Chilean television series Los 80 (dirigida por Boris Quercia) ended this week with record ratings in viewership. The reaction to the series by television viewers took over social media outlets like Twitter and Facebook. Despite the dissatisfaction of many with the fictional plot based on historical facts, the memories that the series evoked and its success debunked the notion that Chileans wish to be amnesic about their past. For some of us, the Chilean diaspora abroad, watching the series through an Internet videostream, watching the series is even a more intense experience that is not softened with the interruption of shampoo and car commercial spots.
For my generation, the one that lived its adolescence during the worst repressive years of the military dictatorship and then played an active role in the opposition to Pinochet during the 1980s, the series brings back the emotional tone and the remembering of the crazy repressive circumstances in which we grew up from adolescence to adulthood.
Some of the facts may be distorted to make the series more palatable to the large majority of Chileans. However, the plot as a whole, not only reminds us of a military and police repressive regime via its thread of detention, torture, and death, but also the authoritarian tone that permeated every institution—family, school, and work. Reflecting about this was in itself a dangerous task even in families. Questioning your teacher could be costly academically or personally. And obviously, to stand pacifically protesting the detention and torture of a classmate or friend was considered a delinquent act.
Los 80 move us to struggle with the difficult task of identifying the torturer with an actual human being, a person who may in its daily life have similar feelings to the rest of us. The plural identity of those who held the authority during that time is hard to accept though. This is particularly difficult since those responsible and those that defended the government-institutionalized violence have not made amends, have not offered to restore some of what was lost to the family of those that were victimized, nor have fully acknowledged the pain that they inflicted on their compatriots.
The fictional plot intermingled with radio and television footage offers us the opportunity to learn about, quoting Allende again, “the deepest truths with the lies of fiction”. Andres Wood, the producer of Los 80—the director of the most acclaimed Chilean film dealing with the aftermath of the dictatorship from the perspective of a child—Machuca—leads us into reclaiming a piece of history that is made even more painful today in lieu of the continuous and ferocious rejection of the traumatic truth by those who still defend the military dictatorship human rights violation legacy.
To still be a witness to the denial of historical facts and the traumatic consequences, in commentaries by television viewers is, however, excruciating. The denial is vast. There is little acknowledgement by many of my fellow compatriots of the suffering by the families of the disappeared, the existence of an immense group of exiles who are not accepted as part of today’s Chile, and the lives of so many that were forever changed because of a savage dictatorship. For those of us who survived, suffered through, and/or were witness of the tragedy around us, the denial and lack of accountability is tremendously painful. The denial of facts and its consequences is a reminder that reconstructing memory in itself does not necessarily still change the soul of a large segment of the Chilean population.
The series is not at fault. Its success is based on the ability to engage the various truths that have been constructed based on historical facts. The death of a journalist as form of vengeance on the part of the Chilean secret service is undeniable. However, for some the facts are still considered a fiction, are minimized, or justified in the name of patriotic unity, economic development, or any other utilitarian goal that sustains the atrocious human rights legacy of the military dictatorship.
Version en Espanol: Movimiento Generacion 80 Blog
Filed under: Community, Family, Psychology, Research, technology, Transnational, Chile, human rights, Media, Memory, social media, trauma
September 14, 2011 • 7:25 am 0
Researchers & Social Media: Brief Presentation at the University of Deusto in San Sebastian
Selected Resources
Filed under: technology
July 19, 2011 • 4:20 am 0
Why shouldn’t governments hold contests that let the people decide which projects are funded? This could start small, with perhaps one percent of government research and development funding allocated to such contests. In these days of American Idol voting and social media-based contests, we suggest that U.S. and European government agencies consider the benefits of letting the peopleWhy shouldn’t governments hold contests that let the people decide which projects are funded? This could start small, with perhaps one percent of government research and development funding allocated to such contests. In these days of American Idol voting and social media-based contests, we suggest that U.S. and European government agencies consider the benefits of letting the people decide.
Filed under: technology
July 14, 2011 • 6:27 am 2
Facebook and Twitter are becoming just circles for me. Moving folks from one network to the other is already happening. For instance, I was never completely comfortable having some great people in my FB friends account who are also people with whom I have a close or distant work relationship.
G+ will make the 140 characters a thing of the past while also encouraging better writing (or the possibility).
Suggestions about how not to bother some but to also connect with others are great. Keep them coming.
G+ is truly a multimedia platform, different learners, different mediums.
Despite being personally suspicious of technological determinism: Wow, G+ has in few hours expanded my network to such a great group of new people who may not be interested in what I have to say but I am. My ego will not be hurt if I am not part of their circles but what a privilege to be able to follow them (and have them leaving me out of private stuff if necessary).
Turns out that my “traditional platform” network has a new life here in G+. New opportunities to connect in different ways, a bit like devirtualizing f2f
Still clunky, yes but probably a feast for us early adopters, may be this is something that will debunk some of the fears about joining a virtual social network for more people.
What do you think close and distant circles?
Filed under: technology, g+, google, technology, twitter
July 6, 2011 • 5:02 pm 0
June 29, 2011 • 7:26 am 0
American Family Therapy Academy 33rd Annual Meeting, Baltimore, June 2011
Virtualizing Intimacy: Emerging Media and Family Connections
Gonzalo Bacigalupe, EdD, MPH bacigalupe@gmail.com+
KEY INTERNET RESOURCES
Pew Internet & American Life Project www.pewinternet.org
Indispensable! A nonpartisan, nonprofit “fact tank,” that provides information on the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. Pew produces reports exploring the impact of the Internet on families, communities, work and home, daily life, education, health care, and civic and political life.
Berkman Center for Internet & Society http://cyber.law.harvard.edu
BCIS studies cyberspace development, dynamics, norms, and standards, and assesses the need or lack thereof for laws and sanctions.
danah boyd http://www.danah.org
boyd (no capital letters) is Senior Researcher at Microsoft Research and a Visiting Researcher at Harvard University Law School, her research examines social media, youth practices, tensions between public and private, social network sites, and other intersections between technology and society. Her site has innumerous resources that are continuously updated. Her public twitter account is @zephoria.
MacArthur Foundation http://bit.ly/mlQrGx
The digital media and learning initiative aims to determine how digital media are changing the way young people learn, play, socialize and participate in civic life. Answers are critical to education and other social institutions that must meet the needs of this and future generations.
The Society for Participatory Medicine http://participatorymedicine.org
SPM is public charity devoted to promoting the concept of participatory medicine by and among patients, caregivers and their medical teams and to promote clinical transparency among patients and their physicians. SPM is a great example of an organization that fully utilize social media to engage with members and the public while also overcoming barriers that separate researchers, clinicians, and patients.
Social Media Governance http://socialmediagovernance.com/policies.php
Database of social media policies.
Dr. Keely Kolmes Social Media Policy http://drkkolmes.com/for-clinicians/social-media-policy
This is a terrific resource for clinicians in private practice needing practical advice of how to handle social media.
TeleMental Health Institute Research Bibliography www.telehealth.org
Telehealth and telemental health updated bibliography.
Technologies and Families www.facebook.com/Technologies.Families
Join our Facebook page for updates on new initiatives, research projects, and to learn more about technology and families.
SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY
Filed under: technology
June 25, 2011 • 9:11 am 1
This is how I started my keynote plenary presentation Virtualizing Intimacy: Emerging Media and Family Connections at the American Family Therapy Academy 33rd Annual Meeting in Baltimore this Friday. Soon will post the resource list and the commented bibliography. This intro was inspired in the notion of hypnotic trance.
Imagine new technologies as an ocean. Where are you located in relationship to it? What is your perspective? Are you flying over and impressed by its immensity? Crashing? Are you sailing, on a motorboat, swimming, diving? In all these situations, the ocean is still an Other. It is something you describe, attend conferences to understand, ask questions, and/or have very strong opinions about. Are you a fish and have never known of something call air? Are you a dolphin, living in the water but needing to come to the surface to breathe? In each case, your experience of the ocean is idiosyncratic and located. If technology is an ocean, then a popular technology, let’s say Facebook, is simply a different thing to each of us, in the context of families, and the clinical encounter. We are not all in the same boat, some are, some are not, and others don’t even know that they need one or their view is from so far up in the sky that they don’t see any boats.
For some, this body of water is a tool to get to places. For others is a scary phenomena, I could drown there, the ocean promises (theoretically) place for some of you, but for others, this is the place where they find sustenance, it is where they live … If you are a fish, the ocean is your environment; the air out there is simply death. If you are a fish, you may ask, Is there something out there that’s not the air I breathe here. These fishes are a bit like my son who asked us the other day when talking about a social sciences class: What is the technological revolution?
Filed under: technology, e-health, family family therapy, family psychology, psychology, social media, technology